Court Summons Chief Femi Falana for Making Jest of Court Judgement

Mr. Femi Falana (SAN)

Nigerian human rights lawyer, Femi Falana has found himself in serious trouble as he has been summoned by a court over an alleged ridiculous statement he made.

A judge of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria, Justice J.D. Peter, has ordered activist lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana (SAN), to appear before him over comments credited to him, Punch reports.

Falana was quoted as saying that Nigerian courts had become “supermarkets where only the rich do their shopping” during the opening of the Enugu branch of the Nigerian Bar Association Law Week.

He made the statement while appearing as the guest speaker at the event. The theme of the event was Corruption and the Justice Sector: Implications for the Rule of Law and Democracy.

The lawyer was also said to have attacked the NBA  for condoning corruption, saying that the body’s  national election had become even more expensive than a governorship election,  with each  candidate spending as much as N700m during the association’s presidential  poll.

Falana asked the National Judicial Council and the NBA to restore integrity to the judiciary by identifying and exposing corrupt judges and lawyers.

But, things took a huge twist when a lawyer from Falana’s chambers had on March 28 appeared before Justice Peter, who sits in Court 5 at the Lagos Division of the National Industrial Court.

It was at the sitting that the Justice Peter demanded to know why Falana had made such a ridiculous comment. The lawyer appeared in the court regarding a case, marked NICN/LA/601/2012 involving Chief Ebenezer Ayodele Obadimu vs G. CAPPA Plc.

Falana’s chambers is representing the judgment-creditor in the case and had then taken an application seeking to enforce the judgment through a garnishee procedure before Justice Peter.

However, before the lawyer from Falana’s chambers could make his submissions, the judge drew the counsel’s attention to an online publication in which Falana had described courts as “supermarkets where only the rich do their shopping”.

The judge subsequently adjourned the case for Falana to appear personally in court to explain “if he obtained the judgment by purchase from the judicial supermarket and for how much”.

He adjourned the case till May 13, stressing that Falana must appear in court to say how much he paid for the judgment which he sought to enforce.